Drawing on the sabotage of the Nord Stream gas pipelines, researchers at the University of Stavanger examine two areas that have long coexisted without truly being considered together: the management of accidental risks and the management of intentional threats.
The article highlights the differences between safety approaches, which are based on trust, transparency, and collective learning, and security approaches, which place greater emphasis on confidentiality, control, and threat anticipation.
Faced with increasingly interconnected risks, the authors advocate a polycentric approach to risk management, capable of reconciling transparency and confidentiality, trust and control, while strengthening coordination between public- and private-sector stakeholders.
Discover this reading advice in detail:
> Polycentric risk governance across safety and security risk logics, from Ole Andreas Engen, Sissel Haugdal Jore et Susanne Therese Hansen
And feel free to explore all the reading recommendations already available online!
More than twenty reading gems in English are waiting to be discovered.
Foncsi's Reading Advice