Questions

What materials, compatibility, theoretical frameworks are appropriate? How have these theoretical and methodological frameworks evolved over the past 15 years?

How have things changed in terms of diagnosis and support? What exactly are we measuring? Is it relevant? How can we better-assess a safety climate?

Is there a need for centralized governance of HOF in companies, what does this governance look like?

What experience feedback can be obtained from the results of the ‘safety diagnosis’ database?

What is the role of the local manager as a link between management and teams in the field? What is the recognition and responsibility policy?

 


Results

Human and Organisational Factors

Practices and Strategies for a Changing World

Discover this Springer


 

Further reading

Industrial Safety "Tribunes"

analysis

The strategic analysis

The Foncsi carried out a strategic analysis on this subject between 2017 and 2019.

Methodology

Strategic analysis is a working methodology developed by the Foncsi. It aims to ensure high-level research over a particularly short period (18-24 months), and to establish a continuum of innovation between research and industry.

There are four key stages:

  1. The state of the art
  2. The international academic seminar
  3. Comparison with industrial practices
  4. The industrial seminar

 

Find out more about strategic analyses

 

 

The project team for this analysis



Experts from companies and associated organizations

  • Nicolas Herchin, Engie
  • Valérie Lagrange, EDF
  • Jean-Christophe Le Coz, Ineris
  • Christian Neveu, SNCF
  • Philippe Noë, TotalEnergies
  • Myriam Promé, Icsi


Scientific experts

  • René Amalberti, Foncsi Director
  • Corinne Bieder, Enac
  • François Daniellou, Scientific Director Foncsi
  • Claude Gilbert, CNRS
  • Benoît Journé, University of Nantes
  • Caroline Kamaté, Foncsi Program Manager
  • Hervé Laroche, ESCP Europe Paris